tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13062504.post113961995786982944..comments2023-06-27T06:54:28.185-03:00Comments on MassResistance Watch: More Stories You Won't Read on MassresistanceBoston Budhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03694800029213245507noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13062504.post-1140028508276839992006-02-15T14:35:00.000-04:002006-02-15T14:35:00.000-04:00Or the fact that women have been carriers of clamy...Or the fact that women have been carriers of clamydia for decades and just like any other virus or disease it usually carries over to the other sex.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13062504.post-1140018579813330782006-02-15T11:49:00.000-04:002006-02-15T11:49:00.000-04:00I think it's more than that. Not only do they lie...I think it's more than that. Not only do they lie about inconvenient facts (e.g. rep[eatedly referring to Amy Contrada as an Article 8 "volunteer" when she's one of their primary public voices), they actively edit articles to remove anything which might damage their "point."<BR/><BR/>For example, in Amy Contrada's article about the rise of a rare strain of Chlamydia, she reprints 80% of the orginal article, but removes this "inconvenient" paragraph:<BR/><BR/><I>Called LGV chlamydia, this sexually transmitted disease has caused a worrisome outbreak in Europe, where some countries have confirmed dozens of cases. Diagnoses confirmed by U.S. health officials still are low, just 27 since they warned a year ago that the strain was headed here.</I><BR/><BR/>and this one:<BR/><BR/><I>Because testing is difficult, no one knows how prevalent LGV truly is. In a surprise finding last fall, Dutch scientists tested some tissue samples stored in San Francisco since the 1980s, and found evidence that today's LGV strain had gone unrecognized at the time. So has it been simmering here all along, or is it on the rise?</I><BR/><BR/>There's a word for people who do this sort of thing...<BR/><BR/>http://massresistance.blogspot.com/2006/02/rare-strain-of-chlamydia-in-gay.htmlAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-13062504.post-1140008212578757822006-02-15T08:56:00.000-04:002006-02-15T08:56:00.000-04:00The oft-asserted anti-SSM, anti-gay adoption mantr...The oft-asserted anti-SSM, anti-gay adoption mantra is that is that two straight parents are always best. Certainly the percentages of those groups who abuse their kids -- physically, sexuallly, emotionally -- is much higher than with gay singles or couples. In study after study, we see figures show that. <BR/><BR/>I know the Dark Side will choose only studies that support their prejudices. When there aren't any of those, they can always fall back on "it's only common sense," otherwise known as "because I said so."<BR/><BR/>They must brush off the straight abusers as aberrations. <BR/><BR/>End rant.massmarrierhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02358207247771711952noreply@blogger.com