I'm actually surprised she is so upset that she had to interrupt her vacation for that lame post. After all, this is the same person who wrote:
And her definition of family:
But how are families with children created except through sex?(Leaving aside that non-hetero parents now have unethical doctors willing to artificially inseminate, no matter what the parent profile is ...)or:
Conservatives do have hearts. We feel for the letter-writer's family. We are struck by the woman's obvious normal desire to be a mother -- but also her self-delusion, her efforts to "normalize" the unnaturalness of her situation. And we are struck hard by the boy's situation. How sad to inflict this twisted reality on a child.
Wouldn't you think someone who appears to be obsessed with sex (both homosexual and hetersexual) and who states that gay couples with children are unnatural and that a heterosexual's ability to have children is normal would be thrilled with a "breeder" label?
To answer the intial question in her post (...Did you know you're just "BREEDERS"?)
Yes, because you, Ms. Massresistance, have told us so time and time again.